|
Post by Sheppard on Oct 27, 2006 20:58:59 GMT -5
half the price is fine for half the gb, It just looks like throw in a few extra for something a little better, I probably willn't get it anywhy though.
|
|
|
Post by Killua Sean on Oct 29, 2006 12:24:47 GMT -5
theres another factor that I just learned that may be true but the one that is $100 more has another reason which is that the one that is $100 cheaper doesn't play ps2 or ps games, its only for ps3 games, and there are a few other little things I couldn't catch the rest at the game store. So if I had the choice I would take the more expensive one because it would be much less of a hassle to just have that instead of that and a ps2. among other reasons.
|
|
|
Post by makdee on Oct 30, 2006 20:43:56 GMT -5
Well, 100 Dollars for more hard disk space and backwards compatibility is worth it if you do not have an old system that is already able to play PS1 and PS2 games. Otherwise, I think it would be a smarter buy to just get the cheaper one. That is only a personal opinion though. I guess I am a little spare with the spending of my money.
|
|
|
Post by Killua Sean on Oct 31, 2006 9:26:03 GMT -5
it has a few other things also I just can't remember, I'll buy the more expensive one if it has certain things that would make game playing on the ps3 games run smoother and easier. The reverse compatibility is just a plus.
|
|